.Purpose
Investigate Sign changes in random walks.
> test <- function(M) {
+ N <- 10000
+ realizations <- matrix(data = sign(rnorm(M * N)), ncol = N)
+ results <- vector()
+ results <- vector()
+ i <- 1
+ for (i in seq_along(realizations[1, ])) {
+ x <- (cumsum((realizations[, i])))
+ zcts <- 0
+ indices <- array(which(x == 0))
+ if (length(indices) > 0) {
+ for (j in 1:length(indices)) {
+ if (indices[j] < M) {
+ if (x[indices[j] - 1] * x[indices[j] + 1] <
+ 1) {
+ zcts <- zcts + 1
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ results <- c(results, zcts)
+ }
+ results
+ } |
> results <- test(19)
> hist(results, prob = T)
> mean(results)
[1] 1.271 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06285/0628535ed073fa25571d79b49674722242c08f1f" alt="SignChanges-002.jpg"
> results <- test(59)
> hist(results, prob = T)
> mean(results)
[1] 2.5856 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67269/672699ba43e2a5d2336f45f068598e287994402c" alt="SignChanges-003.jpg"
> results <- test(99)
> hist(results, prob = T)
> mean(results)
[1] 3.476 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a33/d2a33362067a97345df00d93e649b2d6c40bc2ff" alt="SignChanges-004.jpg"
As it clearly evident, for T = 19, 59, 99 , the expected number of sign changes = 1.2786, 2.5723 , 3.5375
> results <- test(100)
> median(results)
[1] 3 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8219/c8219984b8ba3a376f2903a0484dbc9e2ff1fde7" alt="SignChanges-005.jpg"
> test <- function(M) {
+ N <- 10000
+ realizations <- matrix(data = sign(rnorm(M * N)), ncol = N)
+ results <- vector()
+ results <- vector()
+ i <- 1
+ for (i in seq_along(realizations[1, ])) {
+ x <- (cumsum((realizations[, i])))
+ zcts <- length(which(x == 0))
+ results <- c(results, zcts)
+ }
+ results
+ } |
> results <- test(19)
> hist(results, prob = T)
> mean(results)
[1] 2.5474 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4470/c44703c986dff95be5091e7239e90951b78265ab" alt="SignChanges-007.jpg"
> results <- test(59)
> hist(results, prob = T)
> mean(results)
[1] 5.1361 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37f3b/37f3b1d8c5a5f4372c0531d1cf8b455b73eb6d92" alt="SignChanges-008.jpg"
> results <- test(99)
> hist(results, prob = T)
> mean(results)
[1] 6.9908 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d913c/d913c97ba33d4520ef18fb29ceff0773b240d8a0" alt="SignChanges-009.jpg"
As it clearly evident, for T = 19, 59, 99 , the expected number of sign changes = 2.5727, 5.199 , 6.9048
For 100 tosses
> results <- test(100)
> median(results)
[1] 6
> mean(results)
[1] 7.0449 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24dd6/24dd67959ab0687e57932d0225dd561eee89bfef" alt="SignChanges-010.jpg"
So, you got to understand that the frequency of sign changes goes down drastically for a random walk. For about 100 trials the median crossings = 3 and median crossings and reflections is about 7